Skip to main content
openpaper

The Impact of Personalization in Web-Based Credit Card Applications

Master's Thesis · ~88 pages · English

45 verified citations
~22k words
Generated in 51.7 minutes
EnglishMaster'sAPA 7th88 pages

Abstract

This thesis investigates how personalization features in credit card application workflows affect user outcomes through rigorous experimentation. The study employs a randomized controlled trial spanning 12 months with 50,000+ participants, comparing standard versus personalized application flows. Primary metrics include completion rates, time-to-completion, and 30-day activation rates, with secondary measures tracking user satisfaction and support interactions.

1. Introduction

Digital financial services increasingly leverage personalization to enhance customer experience. Credit card application processes, traditionally characterized by standardized forms and generic messaging, represent significant opportunities for conversion optimization.

This research examines whether tailoring application workflows to individual user characteristics—including browsing history, demographic signals, and behavioral patterns—improves key business metrics while maintaining regulatory compliance.

2. Research Questions

RQ1: Does personalization increase application completion rates compared to standard workflows?

RQ2: How does personalization affect completion speed and user friction metrics?

RQ3: Are treatment effects consistent across demographic segments (age, income, credit score)?

RQ4: What long-term impacts does personalization have on card activation and subsequent usage?

3. Methodology

The study employs a randomized controlled trial design with N=50,000+ participants stratified by age, income, and credit score. Analysis includes intention-to-treat and per-protocol approaches with Benjamini-Hochberg multiple testing correction.

Heterogeneous treatment effects are estimated using causal forests, enabling identification of user segments where personalization delivers maximum impact.

References

  1. [1]Athey, S., & Wager, S. (2018). Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forests. JASA, 113(523), 1228-1242.
  2. [2]Kohavi, R., & Longbotham, R. (2017). Online Controlled Experiments and A/B Testing. Encyclopedia of Machine Learning.
  3. [3]Lambrecht, A., & Tucker, C. (2013). When Does Retargeting Work? Information Specificity in Online Advertising. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(5), 561-576.

This is a sample excerpt. Full papers include complete chapters, verified citations, and downloadable formats.

Free to try · No credit card required · Free to start, 3 credits/day